Goalieboard

The ice and roller hockey goalie bulletin board
It is currently Fri May 24, 2013 7:18 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: 2006 Itech 9.8 Prodigy Soft Flex Pad Review
PostPosted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 1:51 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 6:26 pm
Posts: 483
Hey all,

This review is going to be fairly long (and updated often as I keep playing in the pads over time) since there are very few reviews on the Itech Prodigy line of pads, and that's really too bad.

Although I started as an ice goalie, I've been playing with my college roller hockey team for some time. I've usually tried to maintain a policy of one set of pads for ice, and one set of pads for roller. I've used a very, very broken in set of 36+1" Velocities for ice (they were essentially 36" due to the ankle padding breaking in) and a set of 36+1" DS 992s. My reasons for getting rid of those were, respectively, that the knee cradle in the Velos was a little low since the pad had broken in, and that I really don't care for the Koho-style leg channel of the 992s. That you had to strap them looser than sin to garner any rotation out of them was the final nail in the coffin of those pads. On sportcourt, I use a custom set of 36' Mission 500s which are really, really flexible, which is great for maneuverability on the less forgiving surface. I do give up some five hole closure, but hey, that's what they make sticks for, right?

A series of good investments and unforseen circumstances saw me sitting with way too much money burning a hole in my pocket. Instead of doing something intelligent, like putting it into stocks or bonds, I decided I would treat myself to a nice set of pads. Sitting on ebay for a price that was too good to pass up, I bought this set of 37" Prodigies with the pro soft knee from The Goalie Crease. They did a great job in getting the pads to me earlier than I expected! (Full disclosure: I had some trouble with them in the past over a mix up with shipping on a batch of sticks which I thought was handled poorly, but I decided to give them a second chance. I'm glad I did. Kudos to you guys.)

First impression

I returned from pick up hockey and found a package sitting on my doorstep. The box barely weighed anything, which was a welcome indication of how light the pads were. Upon opening the box, I took five seconds to revel in how nice they were before going to work changing the way the pad is built.

The nice thing about the Itech lines (11.8, 9.8, and 7.8, at least) is that they're pretty darn cusomizeable. The bad thing about them is that in an effort to be customizeable, they include a lot of junk that I don't think I need.

Nittimaki is an idiot

The first thing that I noticed that seemed really goofy was the thigh wing. It's a little piece of HD-80 that attaches to the thigh, ostensibly to help stop pucks from sliding through the five hole and perhaps lend a tiny bit of extra coverage on half butterflies or something like that. There's two problems with this: one, the thigh strap runs on the outside of the wing, meaning there's nylon to ice contact; two, if you like doing the thigh strap anything other than undone, the thigh wing will interfere with your pants. Granted, I have huge McKenney flatface pants, but I'm willing to guarantee that the wing will interfere with pretty much every set of pants out there. Thankfully, it's laced on, so it was a minute long process to remove the wings from both pads.

Image

More stuff getting removed

The second thing I did was rip out the Transforma-Fit calf and ankle pads. Basically, the idea is that you can leave them in if you prefer a shallow leg channel or a pad that is more raised on the skate. Given that these are already pretty big pads, I didn't need the skate lift, and the calf channel just seemed extraneous. Thankfully, they are attached with velcro so it was a simple matter of ripping them out. The loop side of the velcro is actually a pretty darn comfy material on the leg, so no problems there.
Image

Knee protection

Next up was using the adjustable knee wing system. As I mentioned before, I was looking for a true 36" pad at the knee, so I had to use this feature to make sure I was in the cradle. I'd say these fit at least an inch bigger at the knee than similarly sized Vaughn pads (and, as it turned out, another inch bigger at the thigh, but more on that later). At the very lowest the cradle can be adjusted to, my knee hits a smidgen above dead center, and I have a 19.25" ankle to knee height. It was a simple matter of unvelcroing the cradle, moving it down, and re-velcroing it. (Note to those that are curious: no, velcro is not a verb, but yes, I used it as one. So there.) The actual knee lift system was a bit more difficult: since the knee cradle was mounted lower, I had to move the knee wings down one spot to ensure that I was hitting in the center of the wing. That was a more annoying process of unlacing and relacing the wings, although apparently Itech had a run on cord which made the lace about an inch too short to be able to be re-knotted by hands alone. I had to resort to using a needle-nose pliers to tie the knot.

A side note to anyone who doesn't need to actually adjust the wings for height: do yourself a favor and unlace the thing anyway. The wings come from the factory such that both wings are attached to the same side of the leather strip that connects them to the pad. That makes the top wing stick out farther from the pad than the bottom wing, which I imagine is just itching to promote overrotation. I moved the top pad to the inside of the attachment strip and left the bottom wing on the outside, and they are effectively a single block.

Itech apparently listened to people that are annoyed about the floppiness of seperate wings and how they interfere with skating, so they combatted this by using two wings and also running the nylon knee strap through a clip on the inner-most wing. Unfortunately, they used a locking clip with teeth as opposed to a smooth clip, which created some problems with mobility (to wit: the knee wings were too stiff and immobile and were interfering with my skating). I simply ran the nylon through only one side of the clip so that the knee wing can slide along the length of the nylon, which looks to be like a good solution.

Calf and Boot

Itech was nice enough to run the calf strapping through both the inner calf wing and the outer calf wedge. This is good! Unfortunately, when the knee cradle is at the lowest setting, the loop that the top calf strap runs through tends to get lodged in between the knee wings. I removed the strap from the loop; problem solved. The other two straps are more than enough to keep the calf wings snug.

Itech doesn't offer a sliding toe bridge, but the bridge they include does have two sets of mounting holes: one for a normal fit, and another two that move the toe ties an inch towards the inner contact surface. I wear my toe ties with about 4" of slack anyway so it's a nonissue, but I did like the option for the offset toe.

Strapping

The pads come with a leather boot strap, 3 leather calf straps, a nylon knee strap, a nylon thigh strap, and an elastic thigh board strap. I personally keep my boot moderately snug through the center of my skate, the lowest calf strap tight, the middle calf strap loose (if they were quick change and removeable like those used in the Velocity or Smith pads, that middle strap would be long gone), and the top calf strap moderately tight. The knee strap is moderately tight, and the thigh strap is moderately tight.

On the ice

I had a chance to skate around with these for the better part of three hours today.

First things first: Holy crap these are stiff. My Missions and Velos were pillows; my 992s were also extremely stiff (even after being used for half a season) but because I had to wear them super loose, I didn't notice it as much. These are stiff, stiff pads. Thankfully, the ankle already seems to be breaking in after the one session, which is good, because it was causing pain in my skates that I'd never felt before. I had tied the pads up to promote thigh flexure; as of right now, it's going to take a lot longer before these approach any amount of flex. I can only imagine what the hard flex is. This isn't a huge deal since I have an extremely wide butterfly when needs be, but I really wish the ankle was more flexible. I'll be working that break constantly until it's flexing.

The second thing I noticed: These are actually 38" tall when measured binding to binding. I'm not used to the extra height, so I had to adjust my stance accordingly. Wasn't a huge deal, just had to bring my glove hand out more (which is a net positive anyway). Mobility was somehow not an issue. Maybe my Missions were small!

Other important points that I'd like to share, as well as some thoughts I had while playing:

- The Missions and Velocities had lateral flex; that is, the inside gusset would deform a bit when you did a butterfly slide or butterfly move, cushioning your landing a bit and giving the impression that the pad was flexing. The 992s were rock hard when going down. The 9.8s follow the 992 example. Not a bad thing, but I'd imagine some of the more traditional save mechanics would be a bit more tricky versus a pad with give on the inside gusset.
- Full 12" width from midway up the thigh to the ankle means that not only am I never making it in the NHL, you probably should have a wider stance to accomodate these pads. I'd imagine that the 11" width, or a smaller thigh rise, would alleviate this problem. I have a wide stance, so it's a non-issue.
- You can wear these extremely tight and get perfect rotation. Thank goodness.
- If I ever miss the knee wings on these things, I'm probably drunk. They're extremely forgiving.
- Can somebody, anybody, figure out a way to make a thigh board that doesn't get caught in flat face pants? This isn't Itech's fault, as every single pair of pads I own has this problem [You sure it isn't your Yugo-sized pants? -Ed] Sure, I just have to make a kicking motion to get it out, and it doesn't do anything other than be annoying if it's caught, but someone should have figured this out by now. Also, why is it always my right pad, not my left? Also, they did interfere occasionally while I was executing a narrower butterfly. Perhaps I should move to knee pads.
- The toe of these things is the perfect angle. How guys play in square-toe pads is completely beyond my imagination.

Early Complaints, and things I would change

Well, they play really nice, albeit very stiff. They should loosen up as they age though, as I could already feel the thigh starting to bend more as the game went on. There are a few things I'd like to moan and groan about, because I am easily displeased:

- The thigh board straps need about another 6" of strap. I'm (now) a thin guy who has medium sized thighs. A big guy is going to need more strap. I need more strap. At least Itech was smart enough to make this strap inanely easy to replace, but I shouldn't have to replace it.
- The knee cradle elastic is velcroed on both sides, which is awesome since that's usually the first part of the pad that needs replacing. That said, right now, it's also about 3" too short. This I'm willing to give Itech the benefit of the doubt on since it's going to loosen up as I play, but it's still really tight, and I don't have really thick legs. It's not like I can velcro it any looser either, since the elastic has the hook side which will tear into my skin if I leave any hooks un-looped. If I ever gain my weight back, I'm screwed.
- Would it have killed them to make the leather straps replaceable without sewing? I'm appreciative that it saves a tenth of a pound, but I'm going to tear my hair out when I bust a strap trying to sew it back into place. Not to mention that Smith manages to make his stuff replaceable AND still save the weight.
- I understand that Nittimaki likes his goofy little thigh wing. Good on him. That said, this should never be on a pad again. At least it's removeable, so now I have some extra weave lying around for patching or something.
- The rulers they use up in Canada are crap. 38" != 37" guys! I'd personally be okay with a half inch less pad. but I bet I'll appreciate this once they break in.
- White nylon. It's gonna get dirty. Oh well.

As you can see, these are really pretty minor complaints.

Overall impression

These are awesome, awesome pads. I'm not going to sit here and give the thing grades since pads are indredibly personal and what I like might now be what you like, but this pad meets my five major performance criterion perfectly:

- tight strapping
- let me skate god damnit
- as much pad on the ice as possible while in the butterfly
- let me hug the post without giving up a hole
- be light

We'll see how they break in as I use them. I'm extremely pleased with my purchase, and I think that this is a pad that more people should be looking at with a critical eye since I haven't seen very many out in the wild, but the ones I have are at an extremely competitive price.

Thanks again to the guys at the Goalie Crease for the great set of pads and the great service.

More pics:

Image
Image
Image

Yeah, yeah, I know. Banned for lack of couch.
:smt013

_________________
stat whore


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 5:30 am 

Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 8:18 pm
Posts: 1
Location: Brampton
This should be filed under "How to write a great review" at the GSBB.

Awesome job. Those pads look great!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 10:13 am 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 3:16 pm
Posts: 1140
Location: Ottawa
Yes, A+. You and Leafer are the current standards for reviews.

It's always good to know what someone is looking for in a pad and how that pad fails/meets/exceeds their criteria and expectations.

Cheers


Hans

_________________
Goalieboard Wiki, it can be your friend =)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 2:07 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 6:26 pm
Posts: 483
Thanks for the compliments, guys.

Week update:

These are clearly starting to break in. Still stiff at the thigh, but the knee is becoming flexy as well as the ankle. I predict the ankle will be okay after another 5 to 10 hours of use plus benching and other artificial means of break in.

Some stuff I've noticed about the pads that I didn't notice at first are the way rebounds seem to be bigger the further down the leg the shot goes. Granted, I do bring a pretty heavy kick from time to time, but the rebounds at the toes shoot out like nobody's business. That said, shots to the knees and above seem to die directly in front of me, which seems to be a good idea given that I'd be square to those shots versus shots to the sides of me, which should ideally be going towards the boards.

I did get burned on a very, very crappy five hole goal today since I was caught sleeping without my stick in position. That, combined with a narrow butterfly on that shot (I have an extremely wide flare but choose not to use it on shots that don't require it in order to maintain vertical coverage and lateral mobility) left a gap on the ice that the puck went straight through. Something to watch out for, to be sure.

Something else I noticed was that the knee wings seem to be flopping around a ton. I've tried to fix this by tightening up the knee strap but have not had too much success with it; I'll need to seriously muck with it to get it tight enough so the stacks and wing don't interfere with one another but the strap isn't too tight. Dunno why it's happening.

_________________
stat whore


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 2:07 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 6:26 pm
Posts: 483
I finished the first couple plates for my pads today. Simple use of UHMW plastic from McMaster-Carr, an oven at 200 degrees, a drill, and some forethought.

My pads don't have any sort of medial roll (well, they do, but not big enough to put a hole in) so I had to be a bit more clever about attaching these plates.

The knee plates are designed like a pocket; the knee strap goes through the plate as well as the wing itself so that it is anchored quite well. I'll need to put it through some extra use to make sure I don't need to do something extra, like velcro it on the backside, but I'm fairly confident that it should be plenty secure.

The toe plates were a gigantic bear to make. I had to heat the plate and keep reshaping and reforming them to match the toe of my pads. In terms of attachment, the lacing loops through the pad facing lace four times up top, and loops inside and out of the binding towards the front of the toe and at the bottom (only on one pad at the bottom; the other one needs two holes drilled for this. I'll do it tomorrow.). The boot strap goes through the back of the plate, keeping it form fitting when the strap is tightened.

I'm trying to figure out if it is worth it to do plastic for the calf and/or how I'd go about doing it, or if I'll just use white duct tape for the remaining exposed surfaces (it doesn't leave residue, is instantly removeable, and is a bit better than leather sliding on sport court).

Pics:

Toe:
Image
Image
Image


Knee wing:
Image
Image
Image

My babies:
Image

_________________
stat whore


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 1:28 pm 

Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 1:49 pm
Posts: 195
Location: Southern California
Why plastic? Have you tried the bristly side of Velcro?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 3:26 pm 

Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 1:04 pm
Posts: 99
Location: Tempe, Arizona
I believe that the plastic is for increased slide and added protection to heavily worn areas of the pads.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 4:22 pm 

Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 1:49 pm
Posts: 195
Location: Southern California
Velcro slides better.

Wear is minimal on roller when compared to ice.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 10:14 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 6:26 pm
Posts: 483
Having tried both, I find that the plastic does slide better than the velcro on the surfaces I play on. Also, I have to practice on tennis courts from time to time, so I duct tape everything and plate the highest wear areas. Last but not least, the velcro adhesive leaves residue.

_________________
stat whore


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 12:30 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 4:24 am
Posts: 16
Nice review, nice pads, and nice job on those slide plates


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 10:25 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 11:17 am
Posts: 291
Location: Edmonton
Ditto on the excellent review.

I am curious about the slide plates on the toes. Have you tried them on ice? How are they holding up?

Way back in 1978 I accidentally stepped onto the ice with my skate guards on. Subsequently I was laid out like Bambi, but inspired. I got a couple of kidney shaped HDPE slash guards from some forwards' pants and sewed them onto a couple pieces of leather. I then glued the leather pieces (HDPE included) onto the inside toes of my pads. My objective was to reduce the friction between the ice and my pads as I went into a butterfly. I even bought some sheet teflon to glue to the HDPE, but never got around to applying it.
The results of my little mod were better than I could have ever expected. The first time I tried to go into a butterfly I scared the **** out of me. In the absence of friction between my pads and the ice I went down so fast that I was afraid I was going to split myself in two. It felt as if there was a rope tied to each skate, and there was a team of horses pulling my feet outward as I went down. I soon got used to the sliders, and had an incredibly fast butterfly. You have to remember that back then pads were strapped quite tight to the legs, so there was always contact and friction between the pads and ice when sliding into a butterfly. Knowing that I was onto something great, I contacted a patent lawyer to protect my idea. But there was a problem; durability, or lack thereof. My slash guards were only about 1/16" thick, so they didn't last long. I rebuilt them with a piece of 1/8" HDPE I pulled out of the new blocker I bought, but once again, the pucks just smashed it to pieces ( I was playing a fairly high caliber of hockey then). I tried 1/4" puckboard, but again, they just couldn't withstand the impact of a puck. The only material that I got to last any period of time was a toe cover made of fiberglass, laminated directly onto the toe of the pad, but it had to be 1/4" thick to remain intact, and as a result, my pads weighed a ton. Eventually I gave up (temporarily) on my dream to revolutionize goal pads. With the way that pads are strapped on today, I doubt that a frictionless surface would be of any benefit since there is little force between the pad's toe and the ice while going into a butterfly. In fact, a couple of manufacturers are promoting the antithesis of my idea by making (or at least marketing) some of their equipment with special surfaces in that area to increase friction, supposedly to aid in getting back up.

What's the point to my story? I've always wanted to tell someone, but more importantly, a little bit of advice. If the guys you play against possess hard shots, don't try a kick save, because those toe sliders will be smashed into a myriad of little pieces.

_________________
"Every time a puck rings off the post and stays out, an angel gets its wings"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 21, 2007 8:48 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 6:26 pm
Posts: 483
I haven't tried them on ice, only concrete thus far (Sportcourt comes this weekend). They've held up very well and the lighter puck shouldn't pose as much of a problem as an ice puck (I know momentum is .5mv^2 but the delta v between pucks isn't enough to counteract the 50% smaller m, plus I designed the plate to have a good deal of give to reduce the impulse of the impact). We'll see as the season goes on.

_________________
stat whore


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 21, 2007 9:38 pm 

Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 1:04 pm
Posts: 99
Location: Tempe, Arizona
Just out of curiosity, could you post some pictures of the wear on your pads/slide plates? I'm contemplating doing something similar with my 7.8s and I'm just curious to see how much abuse your pads have sustained while playing on concrete.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 10:33 am 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 6:26 pm
Posts: 483
It's on smooth concrete (in this case, my basement floor) so there's really no wear to speak of. I'll take pics after this weekend.

_________________
stat whore


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:33 pm 

Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 1:04 pm
Posts: 99
Location: Tempe, Arizona
Ah, basement hockey. My brother's used to play that all the time back in Minnesota, but sadly out in Arizona basements only exist in theory. If the wear isn't too bad, then you don't need to worry too much about the pictures.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group. Color scheme by ColorizeIt.